Extension of Tax
Cut Stalls in House as G.O.P. Objects
Published: December 18, 2011 - New York Times
WASHINGTON — The House Republican leader on Sunday flatly rejected a
short-term, bipartisan Senate measure to extend a payroll tax break and
unemployment insurance, setting the stage for a bitter year-end Congressional
collision and the potential loss of benefits for millions of Americans.
In an interview on gMeet The Pressh on NBC, Speaker John
A. Boehner said his members broadly opposed the two-month extension that
passed the Senate 89 to 10, believing that it would be gjust kicking the can
down the road.h
gItfs time to just stop, do our work, resolve the differences and extend this
for one year,h Mr. Boehner said. gHow can you have tax policy for two months?h
The surprising setback threatened the holiday plans of lawmakers and
President Obama, deeply embarrassed Republican leaders in both chambers and
raised the specter of a year-end tax increase that economists have warned could
set back the already fragile economic recovery.
The House is scheduled to take up the Senate bill — passed in a rare Saturday
session — when members return to Capitol Hill on Monday night. House leaders
expect the bill to fail and their members to then consider and perhaps vote on
an amended version that same night.
Democrats, led by Senator Harry Reid, the majority leader, reacted angrily to
the turn of events in the House.
gWhen we met last week, Speaker Boehner requested that Senator McConnell and
I work out a compromise,h Mr. Reid said, referring to the minority leader,
Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. gNeither side got everything they wanted,
but we forged a middle ground that passed the Senate by an overwhelming
bipartisan majority.h
Although Mr. McConnell, like scores of his colleagues, voted for the
Senate-brokered bill, he retreated from the measure on Sunday, throwing his
support behind Mr. Boehnerfs idea to come up with a yearlong extension, which
was the original goal of Mr. Obama and Senate Democrats.
gThe House and the president both want a full-year extension,h Don Stewart, a
spokesman for Mr. McConnell, said in an e-mail to reporters. gThe best way to
resolve the difference between the two-month extension and the full-year bill,
and provide certainty for job creators, employees and the long-term unemployed,
is through regular order, as the speaker suggested.h
The once-seemingly sure deal, which allowed the Senate to recess for the
year, was for a $33 billion package of bills to keep the Social
Security tax paid by most workers at 4.2 percent rather than 6.2 percent,
extend unemployment benefits for those already receiving them, and avoid
reductions in Medicare
payments to doctors. The measure would be effective through February.
But the deal slid off the rails abruptly on Saturday, just hours after the
Senate vote, when House Republicans balked after being briefed about the terms
by their leaders. Even a sweetener provision to speed the decision process for
construction of an oil pipeline from Canada to the Gulf Coast could not mollify
them. Mr. Boehner had called the provision a gvictory.h
So in a matter of hours, a hastily written agreement between Senate leaders —
one Mr. McConnell said Saturday on the Senate floor was gnot designed to fail
but designed to passh — gave way to chaos..
Just how hard Mr. Boehner tried to sell the bill is a matter of debate. Some
Republican aides said that Mr. Boehner had warned Mr. McConnell his conference
would be wary of the Senate deal, and that Mr. Boehner had presented it to his
members in the conference call as one of several options. But a number of House
members who participated in the call said Mr. Boehner told them they should
accept the deal, however imperfect, and fight for a better one next year.
Republican leaders are seeking a deal for a full-year extension of the
payroll tax cut to try to blunt what are certain to be Democratic accusations
heading into an election year that Republicans are against tax cuts for low- and
middle-income workers.
The conflict over the Senate bill reflects the fundamental unease that many
rank-and-file Republicans have expressed for weeks over extending the tax
holiday, which would replace the tax increase that would have gone toward the
Social Security fund with general fund money.
It also mirrors a well-established pattern of House conservatives undermining
Mr. Boehnerfs efforts to reach bipartisan compromises on a variety of fiscal
matters. In July, Mr. Boehner and Mr. Obama were close to reaching a large
deficit-reduction agreement but retreated when it became clear that the most
conservative House Republicans would not agree to new revenue measures like
increasing the income tax paid by the wealthy.
gWe are witnessing a pattern of Speaker Boehner walking away from bipartisan
compromises to kowtow to his extreme Tea
Party wing of his caucus,h Representative Chris Van Hollen, Democrat of
Maryland, said in a statement. gThis is the latest example of the Tea Party
Republicans sacrificing the good of the country on the altar of extreme
ideology.h
While some Republicans said Sunday that it was clear last week that House
members might dislike the Senate bill, there was little indication of that on
Saturday. Senators finished up the last bits of their business, including the
vote on the payroll tax extension and a large spending bill, said their goodbyes
and left for the holidays.
Senate Democrats indicated on Sunday that they had no intention of returning
to Washington before the opening of the next session in January.
gThere are only two choices for the House Republicans at this point,h said
Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York, the No. 3 Democrat in the Senate. gPass
this bipartisan compromise or else they alone will be responsible for letting
taxes rise on the middle class.h
There is a slight possibility that some Republicans would join with Democrats
to pass it, which would be a disaster for Mr. Boehnerfs leadership. Mr. Boehner
could also amend the bill to include a one-year extension of the payroll tax
reduction and some conservative policy riders to make it acceptable to a
majority of his conference, and hope that the Senate would return to negotiate a
new bipartisan conference measure based on the two chambersf bills.
Helene Cooper contributed reporting.